Preferences and values for forests and wetlands: A comparison of farmers, environmentalists and the general public in Australia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Abstract

Over the past decades, a trend toward environmental concern has been measured in general population samples. Natural resource management is a complex area in which multiple stakeholders compete for their different views to be heard. Different entities and natural areas must also compete with each other for access to resources such as funding for research and management. This paper describes the natural area management preferences of three samples (general public, environmentalists and farmers) based upon their intrinsic and instrumental values. A cluster analysis of the combined sample shows that while some clusters indicated strong and opposing management preferences, most respondents indicated a mid-range position. Respondents from all samples held the same level of conservation or use preferences regardless of whether the area was a forest or a wetland, but some differences were shown towards endangered species.

Description

The library currently does not have access to the full text of this article.

Citation

Winter, C. (2005). Preferences and values for forests and wetlands: A comparison of farmers, environmentalists and the general public in Australia. Society and Natural Resources, 18 (6), 541-555. doi: 10.1080/08941920590947986

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

William Angliss Institute is the Government endorsed specialist training provider for the foods, tourism, hospitality and events industries. Over more than 85 years we have earned a strong global reputation for the delivery of innovative higher education, training solutions and consultancy services to clients across Australia and abroad. Read more...